Which interfaces are valid local briding targets

Post your questions about SoftEther VPN software here. Please answer questions if you can afford.
Post Reply
pkaf
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:50 am

Which interfaces are valid local briding targets

Post by pkaf » Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:18 am

When setting up an interface using DPDK, it does not appear as a valid target for local briding. Since it's a virtual interface there is perhaps some NIC functionality which we need to emulate in order for it to appear as a valid target for SoftEther?

pkaf
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:50 am

Re: Which interfaces are valid local briding targets

Post by pkaf » Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:24 am

Example for how teh status of such an interface looks like:

Code: Select all

# ip l show dev decrypted
34624: decrypted: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc multiq state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 8a:92:0e:4f:7c:8a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

Post Reply